Yesterday, 12:41 PM
Given your requirements, both Synology and QNAP are solid options, but each has its strengths depending on your specific needs.
Synology has an excellent reputation for ease of use and its software ecosystem, DSM, is intuitive and feature-rich. Since you're already familiar with Synology (and its user interface), sticking with the brand might make sense. The DS923+ could be a good choice for you, offering support for 16GB of RAM (expandable to 32GB) and NVMe slots for caching, which is ideal for running VMs. You can use third-party RAM and NVMe drives with Synology, but make sure they are on Synology's compatibility list to avoid issues. While Synology is a bit more expensive, it offers a great balance of software reliability and user experience.
On the other hand, QNAP offers more flexibility in terms of hardware compatibility and might provide better cost savings if you’re looking to get the most out of your budget. The QNAP TVS-472XT or TS-453D could provide the performance you’re looking for, with support for more RAM (up to 64GB on some models) and NVMe caching. QNAP tends to be a bit more open when it comes to hardware support, but it also has a steeper learning curve, especially in terms of its software (QTS).
In terms of RAM and NVMe compatibility, Synology generally plays it safe by recommending its own certified hardware, so if you want to avoid any compatibility issues, sticking to Synology's recommendations for RAM and NVMe drives is a safe bet. If you're comfortable with the potential risks of using third-party hardware, you can also look at other brands, but keep in mind that Synology does not officially support all non-branded components.
If you're focused on building a private cloud and prefer ease of use, Synology is a great choice. However, if you're looking for flexibility and potentially lower costs, QNAP could be a good alternative.
Given your budget of $2,000, both Synology and QNAP can meet your needs, but it might come down to personal preference and how much you value the user experience versus hardware flexibility.
Synology has an excellent reputation for ease of use and its software ecosystem, DSM, is intuitive and feature-rich. Since you're already familiar with Synology (and its user interface), sticking with the brand might make sense. The DS923+ could be a good choice for you, offering support for 16GB of RAM (expandable to 32GB) and NVMe slots for caching, which is ideal for running VMs. You can use third-party RAM and NVMe drives with Synology, but make sure they are on Synology's compatibility list to avoid issues. While Synology is a bit more expensive, it offers a great balance of software reliability and user experience.
On the other hand, QNAP offers more flexibility in terms of hardware compatibility and might provide better cost savings if you’re looking to get the most out of your budget. The QNAP TVS-472XT or TS-453D could provide the performance you’re looking for, with support for more RAM (up to 64GB on some models) and NVMe caching. QNAP tends to be a bit more open when it comes to hardware support, but it also has a steeper learning curve, especially in terms of its software (QTS).
In terms of RAM and NVMe compatibility, Synology generally plays it safe by recommending its own certified hardware, so if you want to avoid any compatibility issues, sticking to Synology's recommendations for RAM and NVMe drives is a safe bet. If you're comfortable with the potential risks of using third-party hardware, you can also look at other brands, but keep in mind that Synology does not officially support all non-branded components.
If you're focused on building a private cloud and prefer ease of use, Synology is a great choice. However, if you're looking for flexibility and potentially lower costs, QNAP could be a good alternative.
Given your budget of $2,000, both Synology and QNAP can meet your needs, but it might come down to personal preference and how much you value the user experience versus hardware flexibility.